To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 5420
5419  |  5421
Subject: 
Stupid question about steam engines
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 03:11:19 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
2060 times
  
Ok don't laugh me out of the group, but I have a very basic question
about old steam engines. I don't understand the numbers for the wheel
layouts. I thought I did, but after reading a book on train history this
evening I'm even more confused than before. What do the series of three
number mean when referencing the drive wheel layout of steam engines
(i.e. 0-4-0,4-4-0,2-6-0,4-6-2 etc.)?

Thanks

jt



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Stupid question about steam engines
 
(...) The first number is the number of wheels in the lead truck (ahead of the large wheels driven by the rods), divide by two for the number of wheels on one side. The 2nd number is the number of driven wheels, and the 3rd number is the number of (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains) ! 
  Re: Stupid question about steam engines
 
(...) This is the White (SP) system in action. First number is the # of wheels in the leading truck (unpowered) 2nd # is the # of powered wheels, 3rd # is unpowered trailing wheels. All on Loco. Of course, those are relatively easy engines, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)  
  Re: Stupid question about steam engines
 
(...) On a related topic, which steam engine (out of all the ones ever made) had the most number of driving wheels? the most total # of wheels? (25 years ago, 5-Apr-00, to lugnet.trains)

28 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR