To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 24183
24182  |  24184
Subject: 
Re: BNSF new paint
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:28:03 GMT
Viewed: 
6232 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Is *that* what it was, I thought you were baiting with that pejorative term...
> (1). But more importantly, what are you babbling about? I *know* what the engine
> term is. So does Tim. This is lugnet.trains after all, so why should I google
> for it if I know what it is? Trainheads all know.

Sorry Larry, I've had far too many M&Ms today.  And I just can't stop eating
them.

My question was in fact was serious.  I didn't understand how an engine could
have two cylenders share the same combustion chamber.

I realized after that I asked about something without doing any basic research.
I thought I should see what I could find on it.

The rest of it.  Well I've just had too many M&Ms.  I'm sorry.


> > http://www.lexcie.zetnet.co.uk/delticengine.htm
> 
> No, the Deltic is more complicated than an FM. The FM engine is vertical and has
> only one cylinder bank and two crank sets, top and bottom, instead of three
> banks with each pair sharing one crankshaft. FM's are considered by many to be
> quite reliable and rugged and have been a major US N power source for 60-70
> years. Arguably their failure as a loco source was not due to the engine itself,
> just that FM was late to the game and the 244 (Alco) and 567(GM) were already
> well established.

That is a very interesting consept for an engine design.  I have to assume they
are all two stroke engines.  A valve assembly for something like this would be
very strange.

I don't know why I've never came across this design before.

> 1 - this isn't rtlT.

True, now that I'm coming down I'll refrain from using overly creative
explatives.  I do think a Larry Pieniazek Bobble Head would be really cool.

Derek



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: BNSF new paint
 
(...) Well now I'll display MY ignorance... I know that a lot of 2 cycle engines are valveless but I did not think it was mandatory that they not have exhaust valves. Anyway, I am pretty sure the FM is 2 cycle, I think the Alco 244 was (but too lazy (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: BNSF new paint
 
(...) Is *that* what it was, I thought you were baiting with that pejorative term... (1). But more importantly, what are you babbling about? I *know* what the engine term is. So does Tim. This is lugnet.trains after all, so why should I google for (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)

43 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR