To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 20624
20623  |  20625
Subject: 
Re: Did I miss something? What is so intresting about a 1/2-track segment???
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sun, 13 Jul 2003 17:13:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1615 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Jeroen de Haan wrote:
All very well, but I don't see the pro's of half a track; bigger radius and
better switches, yes.
Well, it is very personal. My "set-up" is very modest (I can't even place my
second engine-shed :-( ) and half a straight wouldn't enhance things.

You're alright so long as you always build corners that turn right-angles every
time.  When you start skewing tracks using curves, or laying tracks through
cityscapes at various odd angles, you sometimes end up short by a little bit.
Half-straights may not always be the geometrically perfect piece to fit, but
they'd be pretty helpful nonetheless.

And let's be honest about large radius curves - for right angles, all you need
do is stick a straight on each end of a regular curve.  Large radii look neater,
but one major reason they're a common request is because people are building
longer and longer trains that just can't get round normal corners.

Jason R



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Did I miss something? What is so intresting about a 1/2-track segment???
 
"John" <John@TCLTC.org> wrote in message news:HHxwno.1508@lugnet.com... (...) True, I should get out more... (...) want (...) guess (...) then (...) don't (...) middle (...) All very well, but I don't see the pro's of half a track; bigger radius (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jul-03, to lugnet.trains)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR