Subject:
|
Re: Minifigure Scale
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:55:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1318 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
It would also make minifigures around 3-4 feet wide with a 18" diameter
head. It's silly to think you can use the mini-figures to prototype
anything to the level of detail you want to model. For your pure
prototyping you might as well use your own figures, I would suppose that's
not a problem when you're willing to make your own pieces already. *grin*
Having said that John, we're aiming for that whisimical fun on our layout.
We're going with the figures and to hell with the prototypical when it
interfers.
-john3
In lugnet.trains, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Kevin Loch writes:
>
> > I agree. I try to build all new trains 7 wide. It's a bit more
> > work but it does seem to be the ideal size for the track.
>
> *Ideally*, given that the gauge of the track is just under 5 studs, the correct
> train width would be 10 studs wide (assuming standard gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2
> inches). That puts you at a scale of 1 stud = 1 foot.
>
> That makes minifigs about 5 feet high, which is okay, I guess, but it ends up
> making the wheels look noticeably small.
>
> Nine would be okay, but going odd width all of the time is a pain, so I stick
> with 8 wide. As long as you are willing to go up to 7 wide (more odd widths),
> why not just add the extra stud? There *can't* be that much difference in
> weight or brick count.
>
> And I don't buy the "they look bad in turns" argument-- the fact is that even
> if an actual train *could* navigate such a tight turn, it would look just as
> ungainly. So I use curve-straight-curve-straight for my turns. And what if
> TLC is working on new track geometry even as we speak? :-)
>
> JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) *Ideally*, given that the gauge of the track is just under 5 studs, the correct train width would be 10 studs wide (assuming standard gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2 inches). That puts you at a scale of 1 stud = 1 foot. That makes minifigs about 5 feet (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
27 Messages in This Thread: ![New Poll -Harvey Henkelman (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Sonnich Jensen (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll / only boring promotion for 7-wide trains once again. -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Tim David (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Kevin Loch (6-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -John Neal (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Tim David (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Dirk Meier (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Width with respect to weight (was: Re: New Poll) -John Neal (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Poll -John Neal (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Stefan Garcia (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Matthew J. Chiles (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Poll -John Neal (8-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (9-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Postscriptum - Train History -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (9-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History / Set114 -Klaas H. Meijaard (11-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History / Set114 -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (12-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History -John Hill (11-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History -Thomas Wölk (11-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll // Train History -Reinhard "Ben" Beneke (12-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Ross Crawford (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Larry Pieniazek (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Poll -Tobbe Arnesson (7-Jan-03 to lugnet.trains)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|