Subject:
|
Re: New Poll
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 07:51:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1253 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> I'm at it again...
>
> http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=126
>
> -Harvey (The Train Troll)
You forgot one important answer, so I canot answer your poll at all: I build
all stuff in 7 wide now, since that is my personal favorite compromise in
running behaviour and look. Additionally 7 wide can still run among 6-wides.
7-wide = trains
6-wide = trucks
5-wide = cars
Regards,
Ben
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
 | | Re: New Poll
|
| Agreed. The advantage of 7-wide is also that it runs fine on 12V track, 8-wide will not. My original idea of 7-wide was "broad gauge". 7 wide looks more real as wheels are really under the train. Still, front sheilds on engines are problems when (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: New Poll
|
| 7 Wide for me too + narrow guage of varying studs width depending on size of prototype Tim (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
| | | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) I agree. I try to build all new trains 7 wide. It's a bit more work but it does seem to be the ideal size for the track. KL (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
