Subject:
|
Re: New Poll
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:59:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1328 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke writes:
> In lugnet.trains, Harvey Henkelman writes:
> > I'm at it again...
> >
> > http://members.lugnet.com/polls/ballots/?n=126
> >
> > -Harvey (The Train Troll)
>
> You forgot one important answer, so I canot answer your poll at all: I build
> all stuff in 7 wide now, since that is my personal favorite compromise in
> running behaviour and look. Additionally 7 wide can still run among 6-wides.
I agree. I try to build all new trains 7 wide. It's a bit more
work but it does seem to be the ideal size for the track.
KL
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) *Ideally*, given that the gauge of the track is just under 5 studs, the correct train width would be 10 studs wide (assuming standard gauge of 4 feet 8 1/2 inches). That puts you at a scale of 1 stud = 1 foot. That makes minifigs about 5 feet (...) (22 years ago, 7-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Poll
|
| (...) You forgot one important answer, so I canot answer your poll at all: I build all stuff in 7 wide now, since that is my personal favorite compromise in running behaviour and look. Additionally 7 wide can still run among 6-wides. 7-wide = trains (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jan-03, to lugnet.trains)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
