Subject:
|
Re: subway info?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:41:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
972 times
|
| |
|
|
"James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message
news:G9r5D8.8t3@lugnet.com...
> I _think_ that the habit came from Scarborugh mayor (female, forget name). • I
> _know_ that I picked it up, rather than calling it the toonerville trolley • from
> the start....just force of habit I guess. I would have rather seen CLRV's • on
> the RT than ICTS. ICTS was forced down the TTC's neck, and I don't think • it
> was the best system possible.
Would you rather have seen CLRV's (why not ALRV's?) operating at tighter
headways? (curious)
Iain
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: subway info?
|
| (...) Either or (CLRV or ALRV) (I think of them as the same, even though they are not quite). I would rather seen the streetcars, because it would have made it possible to get streetcars back into Scarborough, whereas ICTS is never going to get (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: subway info?
|
| (...) I _think_ that the habit came from Scarborugh mayor (female, forget name). I _know_ that I picked it up, rather than calling it the toonerville trolley from the start....just force of habit I guess. I would have rather seen CLRV's on the RT (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
