Subject:
|
Re: subway info?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Mar 2001 01:27:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
864 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Iain Hendry writes:
> "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message
> news:G9Jq9A.HJp@lugnet.com...
>
> > > "Don't be dissin' the rt, foo!"
>
> > Come on, I own the first public transfer issued by McCowan station, at
> > something like 5:58 on the first day of the RT opening.
>
> Then what's with calling it the Toonersville Trolley? The rt is far from a
> trolley, and it's very misleading to those who read the group, who were
> thinking "Hey, I'm going to plan a trip to Scarborough to ride that neat
> industrialic ICTS line!", who are now thinking "Ew, it's a trolley? Scratch
> that..."
I _think_ that the habit came from Scarborugh mayor (female, forget name). I
_know_ that I picked it up, rather than calling it the toonerville trolley from
the start....just force of habit I guess. I would have rather seen CLRV's on
the RT than ICTS. ICTS was forced down the TTC's neck, and I don't think it
was the best system possible.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: subway info?
|
| "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:G9r5D8.8t3@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) from (...) on (...) it (...) Would you rather have seen CLRV's (why not ALRV's?) operating at tighter headways? (curious) Iain (23 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: subway info?
|
| "James Powell" <wx732@freenet.victoria.bc.ca> wrote in message news:G9Jq9A.HJp@lugnet.com... (...) Then what's with calling it the Toonersville Trolley? The rt is far from a trolley, and it's very misleading to those who read the group, who were (...) (23 years ago, 2-Mar-01, to lugnet.trains)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
