To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technic.bionicleOpen lugnet.technic.bionicle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / Bionicle / 1642
1641  |  1643
Subject: 
Re: CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:57:56 GMT
Viewed: 
2169 times
  
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, Kyle Beatty writes:

The article is not authoritative. Consider just the internal inconsistency
of the headline:

Lego Halt Use of Some Names

I just thought it was a "crappy " title for the article. <g>

with the content.

It's not at all clear what is going to be changed _except_ the names of the
sets.

Actually the article seems to state that the line is cancelled AND that it
will contine in some way.

To which, I gotta say, who cares?

The kiddies?

Matt

(BTW, those exclamation points were included as part of my cultural
heritage...how dare you change them to question marks! You'll be hearing
from my lawyer!)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP? CRAP?
 
(...) The article is not authoritative. Consider just the internal inconsistency of the headline: Lego Halt Use of Some Names with the content. It's not at all clear what is going to be changed _except_ the names of the sets. To which, I gotta say, (...) (23 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.dear-lego)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR