To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.technic.bionicleOpen lugnet.technic.bionicle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Technic / Bionicle / 1654
1653  |  1655
Subject: 
Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.technic.bionicle
Date: 
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:06:57 GMT
Viewed: 
4058 times
  
In lugnet.technic.bionicle, John Neal writes:
> 
> , yet, when a company, like
> > Lego decides to rip-off names from another culture, words that have deep
> > religous meaning to them, you think they are the ones that are wrong.  Well,
> 
> As many are pointing out elsewhere in this thread, it is absurd to believe that
> a "culture" "owns" anything.  What a load of hooey!

Why is it more absurd than a corporation's claim to a trademark? Note that
the Treaty of Waitangi (1840) http://www.govt.nz/aboutnz/treaty.php3
explicitly acknowledges Maori entitlement to cultural heritage, which
includes their language.
http://www.knowledge-basket.co.nz/waitangi/reports/wai11.html

If LEGO can acknowledge the importance of cultural sensitivity, why is it a
problem for so many AFOLs (one or two in particular)?

> > I say shame on Lego, first to use the names and then to deny where they
> > originated, saying they made them up.  You should really be saying, shame on
> > Lego.  Here, I thought they came up with all this stuff on their own to find
> > out they plagiarized it all.  Just like you can't copy someone else's work
> > in school, the business world is just the same.
> 
> Except that this "culture" who thinks they have a case mostly certainly isn't a
> *business*.

Why should corporations be privileged over other cultural groups with a
distinct identity?

> > Please think about this from a different angle then just, "getting money of
> > of Lego."  This is the business world.  Just like Lego goes after people
> > using their company name, the New Zealand people are doing the same...
> 
> lol When I first started reading your post, I thought you were speaking tongue
> in cheek.  There *isn't* any other way to see this except for shameless $$$
> grubbing.  Sorry.

That's a sad comment on your world view John.

--DaveL



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!
 
(...) Uh, troll, I don't think that the indians *owned* this country in the first place to have it "stolen". But this is .debate fodder for which I have not the time or inclination... , yet, when a company, like (...) As many are pointing out (...) (25 years ago, 30-Oct-01, to lugnet.technic.bionicle)

22 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR