Subject:
|
Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 22:50:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1767 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.technic, Mark Haye writes:
> Yes, I had tried that. I was unable to prevent all the rotation at the friction pin,
> and even a small amount of movement there caused significant wobble/binding.
Well I did a little test, heres the pics:
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/etc/prop/dcp_1409.jpg
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/etc/prop/dcp_1410.jpg
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/RoscoHead/etc/prop/dcp_1411.jpg
Note that the propeller shaft is cylindrical, not "x" axle-shape, so
friction is much greater than standard axle.
It worked reasonably well, even with no lubrication and old batteries. I
reckon with some lube, and maybe even a more powerful motor, it would work
really well.
Oh, and running the axle vertically runs better than horizontally, so even
better for hovercraft 8?)
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
| (...) Nice design. Oh man, the design of the 24t gear at the back of this propeler is realy lame. That whole part is very un-legoish. 1) Perhaps you could use the old friction connector instead of the new one: i.e. part 4459 instead of part 2780. (...) (21 years ago, 8-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Props for Hovercraft
|
| Yes, I had tried that. I was unable to prevent all the rotation at the friction pin, and even a small amount of movement there caused significant wobble/binding. Mark Haye "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message (...) (21 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
