Subject:
|
Re: new 2003 sets: 8455
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.technic
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:08:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1750 times
|
| |
|
|
<snip>
> 1) Two pistons to tilt bucket, clearly showing, and new type of piston w/o
> bottom 2x2, I dislike it 'cause it will be even harder to "stack" them in order
> to make a longer piston. With any luck there is a cross axle hole instead of a
> round one. However it looks like it's round.
I found an easy solution to piston stacking:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~kclague/pistons/pistons-00.html
Kevin
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: new 2003 sets: 8455
|
| (...) (URL) point was all of these solutions is impossible with the new cylinder since it lacks the 2 x 2 "brick" in the bottom. /Tobbe (21 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: new 2003 sets: 8455
|
| (...) Indeed it seems like your right! Zoomes in some more on the photo... (...) I think as follow, front to aft pneumatics only: 1) Two pistons to tilt bucket, clearly showing, and new type of piston w/o bottom 2x2, I dislike it 'cause it will be (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-03, to lugnet.technic)
|
54 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
