Subject:
|
Re: New Survey up for LEGO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 May 2000 13:37:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
674 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Scott P. Costello writes:
> I really think a UCS A-Wing would be great, and because of the size of the
> ship they could probably make the thing for $100. My choices were largely
> based on reality, I can easily imagine a UCS A-Wing or B-Wing or even AT-ST,
> but I cannot imagine a Falcon, or Death Star within my price range.
>
> Scott
Making the Death Star as a UCS set wouldn't make sense. In order to make it
large enough to see sufficient detail to justify the UCS status, it would have
to be huge. I'm not interested in a $500 model that's essentially a gray
sphere.
I want to see a Star Destroyer! If I could have voted for it three times I
would have. Instead, I voted for the AT-AT and Millennium Falcon. The Falcon
doesn't have to be huge - I think they could produce a nicely detailed set
that's not much more expensive than the X-Wing (which is plenty expensive -
I'll cringe when I shell out the 200+ $CDN).
Jeff J
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New Survey up for LEGO
|
| I went with the Falcon, AT-AT and it was a toss up between a Sand Crawler (which we have actually seen) and the Imperial Shuttle. Although an all silver brick Queens Nubian Starship would be very cool. I wouldn't waste my votes on anything that (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Survey up for LEGO
|
| I really think a UCS A-Wing would be great, and because of the size of the ship they could probably make the thing for $100. My choices were largely based on reality, I can easily imagine a UCS A-Wing or B-Wing or even AT-ST, but I cannot imagine a (...) (24 years ago, 28-Apr-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
