Subject:
|
Re: Age range 16+ (was: Re: 2000 Scans are Online!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Nov 1999 16:56:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
51 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Todd Lehman wrote:
> My guess, FWIW, is that TLC is still reticent to admit that the products
> they sell actually appeal to very, very wide age ranges. IOW, if they'd
> marked it "from 11 years," then they'd be admitting that what 11-year-olds
> play with is also what adults play with. Starting it at 16 instead of 11
> lets them maintain the overall age-range illusion, because, for example, the
> difference between an 11YO and a 22YO is much, much larger than the
> difference between a 16YO and a 32YO. And they can't say anything like
> "ages 11-16" for something this expensive...
You might be on to something, there. But it could also be that the sets are
rated 16+ because TLG didn't want to say "These sets are for adults".
It seems obvious the display stands and placards are there to appeal to older
builders, to make it clear that these are display pieces, not play sets. And
because the sets would probably collapse from their own weight if the stands
didn't hold them up. I wonder if the models are removable from the stands? It
looks like they must lock together somehow, or the ships would tip onto their
noses. But if there's a stand-lock, there could be an unlock.
> --Todd (drooling over the hopeful thought of a 7198 Millennium Falcon in the
> "Ultimate Collectors Series" in 2001 or 2002...?)
Eek! The first $1,000 TLC set. :)
A MF in the Ultimate Collectors Series would probably be close to minifig-scale.
That would be cool. :)
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
53 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
