 | | SW Book Argument
|
|
I liked both trilogys. However, I came away from Zahn's trilogy with a better feeling than I did with Anderson's trilogy. I kind of felt like Anderson was trying to cash in on Zahn's success, but I still found the books to be quite good. I agree (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, Dave Schuler writes: [snipped] (...) I wasn't attempting to say that TPM could get away with it's lack of emotion, I was simply trying to point out that another film (ANH), which is touted as being excellent, shares the same (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) I think the Luke/Han relationship is very important to ANH. It's my impression that Han didn't care about Luke until they got trapped in the cell block. Even then its a relationship of convienance since Luke was on Han's side and they were (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) Imperial Shuttle T-16 Skyhopper(ok, it was in the background but it was there) -Chris (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) TLC (...) How about a Tie Fighter? Jude The Q is silent (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) And, few soldiers to man the base (one can only buy so many Snowspeeders)...I hope that TLC puts out some Rebel soldier minifig sets - a Hoth soldiers pack & an Endor soldiers pack. (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) give (...) (stormtroopers). (...) attack (...) haven't (...) Ummm, yeah, the Sandcrawler & Jabba's Sail Barge. (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) TLC may release other classic SW-themed sets with the recycled characters - look at the Adventurer's line - one could build an army of Johnny Thunder clones. I agree with you that TLC will probably not produce many aliens (if any), but it will (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) Yeah! And it would have been better if Jabba didn't very nearly duplicate Greedo's dialogue from the previous scene! Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) friendships/partnerships that (...) relationship is more of a (...) could explain why parts (...) Sorry, just had to drop in two more cents to the collection plate... You're pretty darn close to right. One of the things that makes stories (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) snarling (...) it. (...) seeing (...) Well, in the special edition of A New Hope, when they showed how the film was made, the Jabba scene, before Luke and Ben came on the ship, Han was talking to Jabba, who was a fat human, but never was (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) Woah, woah, wait a minute. The Rebel fleet is not useless! >=O Although I do agree that the Storm Trooper should be available first. Anyways, if they are going to expand the line of Episode 4-6, they'll have to generate more bad guy ships and (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: The reason for no stormtroopers is this:
|
|
(...) That and when Obi-Wan cut off that alien's arm. =) -- Agent 0007 AIM: Agent O0O7 (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) You're right. That scene ended up on the cutting room floor, it was then resurrected in re-mastered versions. The human actor was covered with the overgrown slug we know & love - not a very good scene anyway in my opinion. Scott a (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) Perhaps I saw oddly edited versions prior to '97, but I don't recall seeing Jabba onscreen at all! Dave! (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Another one of those 'what's wrong with TPM' posts
|
|
(...) Jaba The Hutt of the first film, (the original one, not the retouched, effect rich newer editions) was also a humanoid. See the reference multimedia CD title from Lucas Arts, "Behind the Magic" for an interview with Lucas, about how they (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) That's fine, and may very well be consistent with what was on the screen, but if this is the case then there should have been some indication that this is what was happening. As it stands, the ships just disappear without a comment from (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) Sigh. My point is that, if the search for the MF were of paramount importance, Vader could have kept his ship in the field and sent a less-than-clear transmission; after all, the Emperor was able to contact Vader's ship, so some communication (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) Trade federation was obeying to the rule of Darth Sidious, which is apparently senator Palpatine. As long as the election of Palpatine as the supreme counselor is greatly related to the actions of Queen in Croscunt is concerned, I'm not sure (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: TPM RULES (long reply, skip if you're in a hurry...:)
|
|
(...) I clearly remember that this script continued like "..for a clear transmission". So I can't see any character point here. (...) I didn't irritated with this two headed thing, too. And I don't feel myself as silly for that, although I'm (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jun-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
