Subject:
|
Re: Light attack carrier
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 1 Jul 2003 08:36:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
413 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Trevor Pruden wrote:
| |
Jumpin’ Gehosiphat! This rendition rocks! :D
Love the missle tubes, think there should be more crew quarter space
(Although there probably is and we just can’t see it with the limited pics).
|
Thanks Trevor, actually I did consider having more than four bunks, but given
that there’s no easy way for the fighter pilots to transfer from their fighters
to the main craft, I just figured that the ship wouldn’t deploy for long enough
for it to matter.
| |
The landing gear is very good...very clean lines when it all pulls into
place. I would imaging that it would land only when it is in the condensed
mode. BUT, I love the way that this ship has built display stands! :)
|
I consider it a rule - if a ship is intended ever to land on planetary surfaces,
it must have the requisite landing gear. The Tub has similar landing gear,
too... but I haven’t photographed that ship properly yet.
| |
Very submarine-ish. This one belongs on the Shipyard....if Jon would update
it, that is. ;)
|
Actually, for a bit my ego was a little miffed that Jon didn’t put any of my
ships into the .space sidebar... but I’m over that :-)
Cheers,
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Light attack carrier
|
| (...) Jumpin' Gehosiphat! This rendition rocks! :D Love the missle tubes, think there should be more crew quarter space (Although there probably is and we just can't see it with the limited pics). The landing gear is very good...very clean lines (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
