Subject:
|
legOS docs - what do people want?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 22:59:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
969 times
|
| |
|
|
hello,
I am a logOS documentation volunteer, and I am curious as to what type of
documentation the user community would like to see.
What level of detail is required?
What standard format should be used?
How about usage examples of the various legOS features/functions?
How should the docs be organized, stratified, prioritized?
Let's discuss.
Dwayne
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: legOS docs - what do people want?
|
| Dwayne Jacques Fontenot wrote in message ... (...) well I was planning on lurking here for a while and try some of my "newsgroup osmotic learning", but since you asked :) I would be looking for: "getting the very interested (and capable) beginner (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: legOS docs - what do people want?
|
| (...) I would like to see a high level overview, api documentation similar to that created by doxygen, and then examples of usage for each call. (...) HTML works well. The MS Win32 API documentation is a good example for an API documentation layout. (...) (26 years ago, 19-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | Re: legOS docs - what do people want?
|
| (...) I think it would be coolest (and most helpful) if the docs were in a super- portable format, either PDF or, heck, just darn plain old HTML. HTML would be great because it could easily go on the CD-ROM (if there is one) for Jonathan's O'Reilly (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
