Subject:
|
Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:06:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1272 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Forrest <davef@shmoopie.com> wrote:
> "....even when only relative time is required by the OEMs, this may
> often be derived from chips that keep absolute time internally. Those
> chips that represent absolute time using two digit dates are subject to
> Year-2000 failures just as with computers and software as has been
> more widely reported. The logic "It does not need to keep dates,
> therefore it does not keep dates." has no basis in the internal operation
> of the chip. This has resulted in a number of systems being declared
> Year-2000-compliant when in fact their firmware has not been tested.
> The question is not "Does it need a date?" the question is "Does it use
> time in any way?"
>
> from http://www.tmn.com/~frautsch/y2k2.html
In relation to the RCX (that is the subject we're talking about, isn't it?)
this is a complete crock. The H8 inside the RCX does not fall into the
category of chips that "keep absolute time internally." See the H8 specs
for details.
In fact, this thread is a complete joke.
-Kekoa
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: is Mindstorm/RCX Y2K Compliant???
|
| "....even when only relative time is required by the OEMs, this may often be derived from chips that keep absolute time internally. Those chips that represent absolute time using two digit dates are subject to Year-2000 failures just as with (...) (26 years ago, 20-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
