To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 2405
2404  |  2406
Subject: 
Re: RCX Limitations, griping, etc. :)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 6 Jan 1999 02:29:34 GMT
Original-From: 
Jim West <jwest@frii.com>
Viewed: 
3175 times
  
At 12:24 AM 1/6/99 +0000, Mark Tarrabain wrote:
> Only 3 input ports... only 3 output ports... no expandability...  The
> only redeeming thing for it from a programmer's point of view is LegOS.

  Ahhhh....but alas my friend, that is where the challenge lies.  Hey...the
Apollo missions had less to work with. :)

> 
> ARGH!!!
> 
> Okay... I'll try to calm down.  Lessee...what are the alternatives?
> 
> Well, there's the MIT Programmable Brick.. But that's a research project
> at MIT, and there are no plans to commercially sell it.  Can't get my
> hands on one.

  Well...the RCX *is* the commercialized version of the MIT work.

> 
> There's the Cricket.  Hrm... nope.  Only two motor outputs.  Further,
> again, it's an internal project, with no plans for commercialization.
> Again, can't get my hands on one.

  Yep, I agree.

> 
> There's the Handyboard...  Okay, now *THIS* has potential.  But there's
> no readily obvious way to adapt it to a real LEGO mindset.  It's a bare
> motherboard that is subjected to the elements, is delicate, has no nice
> and  easy to follow directions in how to adapt it to plug into any LEGO
> pieces, and overall just isn't suited to unplanned play.  I can probably
> get one of them quite easily, but then what?

  ...and just a tad too large to put into an "empty" RCX case.

> 
> Am I frustrated?  Well... maybe just a little.

  Heh.  Buy two LEGO sets and call us in the morning.

> 
> I'll shut up now.
> 
> Thanks for listening. :)

  Anytime.

> 
> > > Mark
> --
> The preceeding comments are not intended to offend anyone or anybody's
> efforts.  I realize that many people have done marvelous work in the
> area of building robots with LEGO and the available tools, but for inept
> clods such as myself, it doesn't appear that there are  many workable
> options.
> --
> Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics

--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics



Message has 1 Reply:
  Working around the 3 output limitation
 
Someone mentioned a few days back that for a mobile robot you need to use 2 outputs for the motors. I reckon you can get around that on the proviso that you *don't want to stop* one of the motors... Make your chassis like a car, with rack-and-pinion (...) (28 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  RCX Limitations, griping, etc. :)
 
Only 3 input ports... only 3 output ports... no expandability... The only redeeming thing for it from a programmer's point of view is LegOS. ARGH!!! Okay... I'll try to calm down. Lessee...what are the alternatives? Well, there's the MIT (...) (28 years ago, 6-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)

44 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR