Subject:
|
Re: Walkers
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 03:24:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
519 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks for the feedback people.
I asked the question because I have been working on a walker for around 6
weeks, and was getting a bit discouraged.
I have since had some success on the weekend. My walker will now go through
it's complete walking cycle and remain solidly balanced right through. I had
been working on the statically balanced design because when you gear a lego
motor down enough to handle the load (my robot is around 50 cm tall), it is
too slow to do the "fall and catch yourself" walk method.
I hope to have some pics to post soon.
Gordon
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Walkers
|
| (...) My post was to clarify the walker question, the suggestion of using the position sensor was just that. (...) The walker problem is not trivial, as you've discovered. (...) That is a correct observation, but no one wants a walker that can't (...) (23 years ago, 10-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
