Subject:
|
Re: RIS 2.0 status
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 14 Feb 2001 22:54:59 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Steve Baker <sjbaker1@airmail.netSPAMCAKE>
|
Reply-To:
|
sjbaker1@airmail.netSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
1009 times
|
| |
|
|
Brian Dichter wrote:
>
> on 2/14/01 3:21 PM, Kevin Hayes at kevin-no-spam-bhayes@home.com wrote:
>
> > Hmmm... product delay? I wonder if they're not working on some new
> > additions to the set.
I wonder if that earlier date is correct for some parts of the world.
We've seen the box artwork for the Japanese version of RIS 2.0 havn't
we?
Personally, I find it hard to get all *that* excited about it. The photos
of the parts lists for the Japanese version seemed to show very little
change from the 1.0 and 1.5 versions. The *BIG* changes are in the software
(but we already have 2.0 software that runs on 1.0's and 1.5's) - and that
the IR tower is on USB instead of the serial port (which means that straight
off, there won't be a workable NQC and people with older computers are
screwed).
> Yeah, maybe this version will come with the voice-activated self-aware,
> self-programmable lego bots who will not only make my coffee to perfection
> each morning but serve it to me and tell me I'm a good robot-master! 8)
That would kinda spoil the fun though - don't ya think?
Personally, I'm disappointed that they didn't go for something much
more radical for 2.0. It's such a minor change, it ought to be
RIS 1.6 or something.
I'd still like to see a bunch of small computer bricks that are each
integrated with a single sensor or a motor and which connect via some network
like I2C or something and take power from a central battery box so that
you could have unlimited numbers of motors and sensors and unlimited
computer power. I *really* hate the 3 motor + 3 sensor limitations
of the RCX.
An expandable setup like that would make the computing side of
Mindstorms be much more like Lego bricks themselves - open to
infinite exapansion possibilities. They could still make low
end 'toys' like microscout - but just add an I2C connector to it.
--
Steve Baker HomeEmail: <sjbaker1@airmail.net>
WorkEmail: <sjbaker@link.com>
HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
Projects : http://plib.sourceforge.net
http://tuxaqfh.sourceforge.net
http://tuxkart.sourceforge.net
http://prettypoly.sourceforge.net
http://freeglut.sourceforge.net
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: RIS 2.0 status
|
| Excellent idea ! Has anyone tried to add an I2C interface to a u-scout ? My u-Scout just sits on the shelf... Hmmm. I'd be wiling to sacrifice it in the name of science if some one could give me some pointers : ) -Xanthra47 "Steve Baker" (...) (24 years ago, 15-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: RIS 2.0 status
|
| (...) Yeah, maybe this version will come with the voice-activated self-aware, self-programmable lego bots who will not only make my coffee to perfection each morning but serve it to me and tell me I'm a good robot-master! 8) brian (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
40 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
