 | | Re: KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
One of the most opinionated members of Lugnet replies to my message. Should I be offended or honored??? Actually I liked you post Allan, just have some opinions of your opinions below. (...) No offense, but one of the poorer qualities of being an (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back - and my website has moved
|
|
(...) Wow Brad... the little Lego-maniac is adorable... he has the look of "leave me alone, I'm playing with my bricks!!!" :) Benjamin Medinets (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.us.lugola, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm back - and my website has moved
|
|
(...) is 9 months now and we recently pulled those supplies out of storage in the attic. (...) "fantasy" creation because nobody could ever build it in the flesh. With the unlimited parts selection in LDraw, grand-scale creations just plain don't do (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.org.us.lugola)
|
| |
| | Re: KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
(...) When any of the following occur ... As you take your trolley full of Lego to the checkout/cash desk, the shop assistant says "You're going to make some boy/girl/child/kid very happy". Your friends come to your house and see your Lego, and say (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
(...) Do yourself a favor and don't worry about becoming an AFOL. I'm 33 and I hope never to be one. :) (...) In all seriousness, I think there is far too much emphasis placed on labelling folks around here. Be yourself, that's the best thing I can (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
(...) Or "ardent"! ROSCO (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
(...) This is a remarkable definition of what is an AFOL! Thank you. You can always read the A as "adolescent". That works too. -Erik (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | KFOL vrs TFOL vrs AFOL terminology
|
|
I too am young (16 - started LUGNET at 15 ) but I feel that this great place treats all us youngin's just great. This begs the question, when do you become an AFOL? I consider myself an AFOL because I have passed my dark ages, I am supporting my (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | I'm back - and my website has moved
|
|
As some of you may have noticed, I've been pretty much out of the LUGNET scene for several months now. Contrary to a lot of folks lately, this had absolutely nothing to do with the political climate on LUGNET (which I think is just as good as it (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.people, lugnet.build.arch, lugnet.org.us.lugola, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
Howdy Bob, You are not alone among the true believers of the power of the almighty Brick. I am glad that you are on the right road and still sane (at least to our eyes). Lugnet is a great forum for creative thinkers and LEGO is a great tool for the (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
(...) snipped (...) Unless both people agree that things aren't working out, then any kind of break up can be difficult. The longer the relationship, the more messed up one can become. We were married for just over 10 years when she started the (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
Bob, I'm sorry to hear about your divorce. These things are always sad, no matter who is involved or what the reasons are for them. Almost exactly a year ago, my girlfriend of 9 months broke up with me, and I thought that was a pretty awful thing to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
"Todd Thuma" <thumat@gactr.uga.edu> wrote in message news:GszBAs.Dr6@lugnet.com... (...) for a (...) with (...) the (...) out of (...) report (...) LEGO (...) What? Details! Do you mean TRU actually banned you? How do they enforce that? (24 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Parker" <cg47@hotmail.com> (...) Explorer. (...) shall be (...) Hehehe. This is pretty funny. Brings to mind the catastrophic TV show "Who wants to marry a millionaire?" "Who wants to date an AFOL?" Seriously (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
In lugnet.people, Tanya K. Burkhart writes: snipped (...) It sure is important to be comfortable with being by yourself. However, I do prefer being with someone when going on picnics, hiking in Sabino Canyon, visiting the Grand Canyon, etc. - Bob (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
In lugnet.people, Matt Hein writes: snipped (...) That's not a bad idea - actively try to find a girl interested in Lego too...hmmm. Maybe I could trade Lego sets for dates... "Up next for the lucky woman* to date Bob is a MISB 497 Galaxy Explorer. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Leaders vs. Rulers
|
|
(...) excellent point (...) also excellent, in fact communities RELY on members to not only self-police but to co-police each other. Think about any football game when an athlete gets angry and the other guys help calm him down. no one wants to see (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet's tailspin
|
|
hey this is a great idea worth looking into in my opinion -paul (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Lego and Lugnet for being there...
|
|
(...) Wonderful for you! :) (...) There are a few of us out and about... Just remember that being happy by yourself is every bit as important as being happy with someone else. :) Tanya (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | how much is enough?
|
|
(...) well, first of all, some of that $ would go to server costs. but you could pay a number of 'volunteers' the equiv of part-time pay above and beyond their day-jobs. 1) you get better results from the 'employee' (or they get fired) 2) you get (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.people)
|
