| |
In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.trains, Brian Darrow wrote:
> > Here's a sneak peek at the mountain module I'm making for IndyLUG/Central
> > Indiana LTC's display at this years Children's & Parents Expo Feb 19,20 & 21 at
> > the Indiana State Fairgrounds. There are three train loops and the lower two
> > can run independantly or be switched to connect with the rest of the club's
> > layout.
> > I've still got a lot of details to add however here's what's done so far:
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=1088425
> > and once moderated
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=115505
> > Brian Darrow
>
> It's big, it's cool, and there's lots to like. The roadway and parking lot, for
> example are really neat. Always glad to see people building mountains.
>
> Spotlighted!
>
> I have a couple of bones to pick though...
>
> Water isn't blue. I think it's much more effective to do water with clear or
> transblue elements...
>
> Snow on top? I think this tends to make mountains look "Disneyish", even with
> selective compression our mountains are NEVER big enough to have a distinct,
> visible snow line... That sort of line tends to only be visible at much farther
> distances. This mountain isn't high enough to justify snow at the top and non
> snow at the bottom.
Why is a "Disneyish" bad? You make it seem that non-real world accurate scene
elements are bad and should never be modelled. I like the look of a
"Disneylike" exaggerated scene, maybe that's why I like the Disney parks so
much.
-Orion
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
32 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
