Subject:
|
Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:14:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
575 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes:
> i just don't get it. the robot will now solve the anti-x reliably, but
> I am getting a 50% DROP in success of solving almost ANY other pattern.
> And by this I mean the same software under the same conditions and the
> robot just FREEZE's half the time.
>
> ARGH!!
To (mis)quote the IBM commercial:
"That's when it hits you: You are so beat by Bruce." :)
If it makes you feel better, I have disassembled pretty well all of the
xEmployees entry to increase sensor resolution, gearing ratios, EOAT speeds
and a pile of other improvements. I presume Mario will continue with
AntiPat* code, and smore software updates, at least that's the plan unless I
get conscripted into the test/verification cycle at the office instead of
the usual.
We're not up against a wall yet. But the only walls out there are
perceived--the only wall is really in your own design and whatever
logic/reasoning fits behind it. It's a matter of really characterizing why
the robot does something. Collect data. Collect statistics. Change ONLY
ONE VARIABLE AT A TIME.
Calum
*-named after the Pat Problem, a strategic flaw noticed by a coworker named Pat.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
| (...) this is my plan. I want to SLOW the entire thing down, and start to display data on the LCD. Bruce suggested to me that maybe some "stack" is not mis behaving. So a question to the Group. if a v 1.0 RCX that is always powered by an official (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | Re: Robot - Accuracy
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GrGMsq.Mqq@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) named Pat. LMFGDARO. MAN I missed you guys. Iain (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
| (...) WELL, truth be told, what Derek told us really scared me. from my current speed of (bleep) the thought of having to shave off 4 more seconds.... I just knew I could NOT do it in software. i took a look at my code and i can safely say that ALL (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
