Subject:
|
Re: Robot - Accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:54:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1068 times
|
| |
|
|
"Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message
news:GrGMsq.Mqq@lugnet.com...
> and a pile of other improvements. I presume Mario will continue with
> AntiPat* code, and smore software updates, at least that's the plan unless
I
> Calum
> *-named after the Pat Problem, a strategic flaw noticed by a coworker
named Pat.
LMFGDARO.
MAN I missed you guys.
Iain
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
| (...) To (mis)quote the IBM commercial: "That's when it hits you: You are so beat by Bruce." :) If it makes you feel better, I have disassembled pretty well all of the xEmployees entry to increase sensor resolution, gearing ratios, EOAT speeds and a (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
