To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 3628
3627  |  3629
Subject: 
Re: Robot Accuracy
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Fri, 15 Feb 2002 03:19:26 GMT
Viewed: 
627 times
  
wimp out and drop down to you lowly touch sensor types

Dave...Dave...Dave   What the heck is wrong with touch sensors??  I'd use a
temperature sensor if I thought it would help.
With that kind of thinking, you better get used to the concept of 3rd place
(at best!)...Matthias and I will be taking First and Second
Bruce



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robot Accuracy
 
(...) Bruce this is just the kind of thinking I like to hear. With ideas like this I am SURE to take FIRST place. you and your temperature sensor can have 8th or 9th. just ahead of Calum and his Official lego palm tree robot. -- Chris I can see (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robot Accuracy
 
(...) As one who made it a self-imposed design condition to exclude active sensors (and multiple RCX's, and - where possible - anything made after 1975) I am truely insulted. Having said that, I too have hit a wall. After almost 8 weeks of almost (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

21 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR