Subject:
|
Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Wed, 13 Feb 2002 02:06:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
399 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Bruce Sheridan writes:
> I haven’t finished my robot because I couldn’t get repeatable accuracy from
> the rotation sensors. I tried various solutions but nothing was giving me
> the accuracy I wanted. It was driving me nuts!
>
> I switched over to touch sensors, combined with a slightly more involved
> chunk of logic that controls the movement, and I can now make that sucker
> stop consistently on a particular tooth of a gear rack. To test it, I put
> it in a loop…and so far it has hit the mark 368 times!
>
> That was the X-axis…now for the Y-axis…
What do you mean by tooth? As in variability of a width of a tooth (ie,
roughly 2mm wide (I mean, 1/8" of an inch or so :)) or like consistently on
the top of the tooth?
Calum
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Robot – Accuracy
|
| (...) On the top of the tooth....within 1/16th of an inch...every time. On top of that, my x-axis is the heaviest component (carries the Y-axis) and is driven 3:1 to the rack. (22 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Robot – Accuracy
|
| I haven’t finished my robot because I couldn’t get repeatable accuracy from the rotation sensors. I tried various solutions but nothing was giving me the accuracy I wanted. It was driving me nuts! I switched over to touch sensors, combined with a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
