 | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Certainly I understand I have no authority in your NG. But, the TOS does have an authority in your NG. The comments were crossposted to a mainstream part of LUGNET too. While I would still find the post distasteful, I would have less of a (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Of course we know you, Ross! Calum (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Tim, I understand your good intentions. I think no one is doubting that Iain and Richard were against TOS. And you're right, we're all the guests of Todd/Suzanne or whoever is running Lugnet these days. However, you also have no authority for (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | rtl10 Service Pack 1: RCX Soccer
|
|
After reading the idea presented by Rob in an earlier message, I'd like to propose a new event between rtl10 and rtl11, a sort of rtlToronto Lite kind of deal. The goal would be a fun event that doesn't involve too much work, gives a light easy (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Bizzare find at Sears Clearance Center (Brampton)
|
|
That *is* a bizarre find. Only in Canada, eh. To ease the impact of facing your wife, I'd be interested in buying the USB IR tower if it's up for sale. Or even a trade with a serial one if that suits you better. Mario (wondering if infrared light (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Yep. I could have. I could have thought, 'why waste my time' and totally disregard the concern I have for the betterment of LUGNET. (...) If it isn't entirely obvious, I don't have much regard for this slippery slope opinion. This isn't (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Bizzare find at Sears Clearance Center (Brampton)
|
|
I paid a visit to the Sears Clearance Center in Brampton this evening. Sorry, I didn't think to write down any set numbers or specific prices but I do know that they were all marked down to 50% of Sears' regular price. Here's what I found: Lots of (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Train3 Updated Layout and Door Dimensions
|
|
Hi folks, First, check out the latest layout diagram here: (URL) now integrates modules from Derek as well as spacer modules which will be filled by JeffE, Richard and Ben. The left spacer I will bring completely bare-JeffE and Richard, could you (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) But you’re an honorary Member! After all, you took part in the 1st rtlToronto Train Event!!! --==Richard==-- (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: return to Zen on rtl Toronto
|
|
(...) < 32X64 (...) < Probably? (...) < 72.879% probability (...) (Y’know Ben, I really appreciate your continued support and enthusiasm for the BrickWarz quest, perhaps this summer we’ll get a game under way!) (...) I really appreciate that! =) (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Buddhism
|
|
I'll adopt Ben’s Zen state-of-mind to answer this question: (...) And illusion? Perhaps… But if the group collectively embraces it, it becomes our reality. And in this organization we dictate the state of the matrix. Therefore, if we should so (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Here's one 8?) ROSCO (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) It displays all groups to which the message will be posted in the authorisation mail. They're above the actual message, on a line titled "Newsgroups" (...) They're already there, as well. Right up the top. Though many people (including myself, (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Richard: In some ways, yes, but I see your point and it is a valid one. I'm glad SOMEONE is defending free speech, even though the TOS is clearly stated. I also had a good chuckle-you're a funny guy, I liked your immediate response to Tim :) (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | return to Zen on rtl Toronto
|
|
oh well, let's get to the subjects at hand..... we (as a local lego group) have to busily prepare for the next two events... Train 3, which is just over 1/2 a week away..... and Robotics 10.... that should keep everyone busy.... so let's get back to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Because of the web interface, what you or anyone else say in "your" NG is hardly private. Many if not most view any post no matter which NG it's in. You may think you "get away" with stuff, but that's only an illusion. -John (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) Sorry, Richard. I cant speak for Calum. I can speak for me. I personally was not going to wade into this BUT you did bring up my name. I was not/ am not hanging my head in shame. What happened, happened. It was unfortunate that Iain, did not (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) That’s –EXACTLY- how I felt! Why’d Tim have to ‘Five-O’ u on such a minor statement? He could of just ignored it and let it pass. (It’s not like the whole newsgroup was about to be spammed by ‘lewd-anagrams!’) This just totally wastes Suz’ (...) (23 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: faster than a 48x CD re-writer
|
|
(...) HA, Dave, that's GREAT news. congratulations!!!! :) Of course as you have stated we both have LOTS of time to make the robot faster. I've got a few more timing tricks up my sleeve to try to speed things up. I've been in discussion with a few (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general
|
|
(...) hey Bro, all you had to do was remove the lugnet.general newsgroup from your posting....that would have saved everyone from trouble... Ben (23 years ago, 15-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
