Subject:
|
Re: SETI@Home?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 May 1999 22:59:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
643 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 18 May 1999 00:34:02 GMT, cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley)
wrote:
> If I do it I'll either use MS Proxy for NT Server (practicaly since I
> would be doing hands-on stuff that might help me with the Proxy class
> should I choose to take it, and I probably will) or just setup ip
Yegh. Sounds bloody awful.
> masquerading on a full-time Linux box, something I don't have right
> now but need. Both would be useful experience.
That works. Buy an old 386 with at least 8 megs and 100 megs, need no
fulltime screen, keyboard, floppy, or CD drive.
And it works quite well.
barney:~# uptime
10:55pm up 43 days, 10:50, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
barney:~#
It's been rebooted a while ago because of a power failure.. Could have
been much longer uptime otherwise.
Try that with an NT based Proxy server. Besides, proxies are like _so_
unhip.
If ya have any questions, ya know where ta find me ;)
Jasper
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Bloody awful but also bloody useful. I'm actually going to get my boss to send me to a new Linux admin class I got an e-mail about, but, for the most part, MS certification (and experience) is a lot more valuable where I live than Linux (...) (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Oh, I wouldn't bother with Wingate, although it is a decent enough package for two computers. If I do it I'll either use MS Proxy for NT Server (practicaly since I would be doing hands-on stuff that might help me with the Proxy class should I (...) (26 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
