Subject:
|
Re: SETI@Home?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 May 1999 22:58:37 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
505 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> Oh, I wouldn't bother with Wingate, although it is a decent enough
> package for two computers.
That's why I said use Sygate :-)
> If I do it I'll either use MS Proxy for NT Server (practicaly since I
> would be doing hands-on stuff that might help me with the Proxy class
> should I choose to take it, and I probably will) or just setup ip
> masquerading on a full-time Linux box, something I don't have right
> now but need. Both would be useful experience.
If I knew what you was talking about /-)
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Well, it doesn't really matter until I get more than 5 machines at home. I have an ISDN router from work with 4 ports, connected to another 4 port hub. That gives me a current maximum of 6 machines connected at one time without adding another (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Oh, I wouldn't bother with Wingate, although it is a decent enough package for two computers. If I do it I'll either use MS Proxy for NT Server (practicaly since I would be doing hands-on stuff that might help me with the Proxy class should I (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
