Subject:
|
Re: SETI@Home?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 May 1999 23:59:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@NEWSGUY.avoidspamCOM
|
Viewed:
|
275 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> > http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
>
> Anyone else managed to get around the server-bog problems? I've basically
> turned my SETI@Home off for a couple of weeks. Once they release 1.1, I'll
> try that out.
Nope, I just put up with it. Since most of the computers I have
running it are not in front of me it doesn't bother me.
On thing I have noticed - on the same hardware, the Linux version
STOMPS the Windows version. On my P2-450 it takes me about a day to
complete a unit under Windows. On the same machine running Linux it
takes about 9 hours.
I hear my G3-266 at work is outperforming my P2-400 running Win98 as
well.
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Unfortunately, none of my machines can be allowed to connect automatically, so I have to deal with connection failures. (...) I'm guessing they developed the software under Linux, then ported to Windows. And haven't changed optimization to (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | Re: SETI@Home?
|
| (...) Yeah. My Celeron Mendocino 450 Win98 takes in the order of 26 hours or so as well, but it definitely varies a lot with the particular unit I'm running. Jasper (25 years ago, 30-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
