Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 5101 – 5120 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Careful--in principle, God's nonexistence can be proven simply by demonstrating a logical contradiction in his essential nature. Of course, the faithful are generally willing to accept any number of logical contradictions in order to preserve (...) (22 years ago, 20-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) What if the belief system itself is flawed? As I understand it, to be a good muslim, one has to follow sharia (religious law). Sharia is used as civil law in many countries and in many others, it's being pushed as something that SHOULD be used (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) What you are asking for is akin to me asking you to prove that God doesn't exist. The facts that you are providing are not causal, but more like coincidental, and certainly not evidence of conspiratorial. Bechtel got some contracts. Fine. And (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) For the sake of clarity I agree with the sort of punitive sterilization you describe here, for those reasons. I just think people can prove in many ways that they most likely will BE unfit to care for their children. Like I said, I don't think (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
"Christopher L. Weeks" wrote: <snipped a lot of incendiary rhetoric> I feel as though the climate in this newsgroup had grown very hostile. So much so, that I am going to unsubscribe from it because I choose not expose myself what I feel is (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) I'm seeing that the term "Enlightenment" was probably too loaded a word for the idea I wished to convey. What I meant by it was an intellectual passing into the 20th Century. By most accounts I have read, it is generally agreed that Islam is (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Hotel Palestine
(...) (scratching my head) All that what you've said is what appears reasonable, but strictly from a military POV. Although the casualties can be (arguably) decreased in regular action with that quicker method, the risk of catastrophic failure under (...) (22 years ago, 12-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Who are you to tell me this? I'm only telling one stupid person that posts racist and hateful stuff here on Lugnet that what he posts is stupid. If you endore his attitude, if you endorse what he says, it should be you who should be warned (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Uh, I thought that they were silently disagreeing with me. But so what if they do? You don't seem to care about what others think of your views. Are you suggesting that I keep quiet because the majority happen to think differently than I do? (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
(...) Well, John, I couldn't care less about your opinions. I don't seek any facts from people like you. You have prove many times that you believe certain things and I, like many others, think you are not very brilliant. So I don't care what you (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Guess who's next?
Let's play a game! We all throw in 10 bucks and state, for the record, who the next coutry targeted for 'WoMD disarmament' and 'harbouring terr'sts'-- I guess Syria (URL) and British officials turned up the diplomatic heat Monday on Syria, with the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Good idea. You might at least want to take a step outside, and check the name on the shingle. This ng is supposed to be for debate. It occasionally gets hot, but rarely hostile. Steve (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: federalist ISBN (was Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
On Thu, 8 Jul 1999 02:12:24 GMT, Mike Stanley uttered the following profundities... (...) Have a Gestetner photocopier hooked up to the network, so it will be pumped through there, to make an A5 sized booklet. (A5=210mm x 150mm) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) [snip] (...) As a former teacher, two of the biggest problems with today's schools are: 1. lack of funding - classrooms are overcrowded, teacher salaries over the last 30 years have actually decreased (differnce of 1960's salary times (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: The hardest thing in the world to understand is the federal income tax.- Albert Einstein.
(...) have to point out that of all the posters to this thread that responded to my original post or any other, you came the closest to actually addressing what was being said. What the article was addressing was not how much tax ought to be paid, (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: The hardest thing in the world to understand is the federal income tax.- Albert Einstein.
(...) have to point out that of all the posters to this thread that responded to my original post, you came the closest to actually addressing what was being said. What the article was addressing was not how much tax ought to be paid, nor how much (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) were (...) Why, because we had the nerve to see that things were wrong and fought to right them? Or because your generation has done absolutely nothing but reap the goods for nothing. (...) In the 60s you didn't have to hire anyone. You could (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Actually, you can, and it was the intent of the original program - to assist those with no income and to assist those who are underemployeed. (...) [snip] (...) Well, actually, he has to pay unemployment insurance (which is part of his taxes). (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) You're stretching here, you know. This notion that you paid in advance for food stamps and therefore are entitled to get them kind of runs counter to the notion that the needy deserve help whether they paid for it or not. You can't have it (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Christopher L. Weeks wrote in message <3783B529.73A74C27@c...ri.edu>... (...) against (...) were (...) Groovy! <silly debate snipped> (...) Chris, I tend to agree with you more often than with Ed "Boxer" Jones, but if you would advocate the above, I (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.280)

More: Next Page >>