To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 1418
1417  |  1419
Subject: 
Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 12:52:01 GMT
Reply-To: 
CJC@NEWSGUY.avoidspamCOM
Viewed: 
928 times
  
Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote:
Mike Stanley wrote:

Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote:
frown on it dramatically through whatever is appropriate given the
context of the society in question. (brace yourselves)   For our
in-your-face and in-your-wallet government, I suppose sterilization, and
removing the children to families that will take care of them would be appropriate.

I agree.

I've actually thought a plan of universal reversible sterilization
would do just fine, with some form of proof of worthiness to be
un-sterilized.  The worthiness part is the tricky part - I know I'm
not qualified to make decisions like that, although I submit that
collectively we all are.

For sake of clarity, I only think such a procedure should be employed
for those who demonstrate the unwillingness to care for their young.
People can disagree with me in any number of ways and still have the
RIGHT to have kids as long as they are going to care for them in a
societally acceptable manner.

For the sake of clarity I agree with the sort of punitive
sterilization you describe here, for those reasons.

I just think people can prove in many ways that they most likely will
BE unfit to care for their children.

Like I said, I don't think that *I* am qualified to choose something
as important as that.

--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
 
(...) For sake of clarity, I only think such a procedure should be employed for those who demonstrate the unwillingness to care for their young. People can disagree with me in any number of ways and still have the RIGHT to have kids as long as they (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

433 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR