To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 5021 – 5040 of about 12000.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) Let's go ahead and ignore all the sweeping support GWB received in the state of Texas, and talk just about his tenure as president. I would say successfully launching campaigns to remove both the Taliban and Husein regime from power was a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
 
(...) Eeep!! Oh wait. All we like sheep... Dave K (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: How Will We Ever Wash the Stink of GWB Jr. Off?!
 
(...) Dang...I can't! Gosh, that was a painless debate. :-) -->Bruce<-- It's that circumvention of all laws that gets me: no, they aren't combatants, so they don't fall under the Geneva conventions, and yet they are held under military law so they (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
 
(...) Hey, all are welcome! (...) Bruce addressed this already, but I thought I'd throw in my view as well. The first is the problem of precedent: when you estimate the odds of a bus accident, you can base it on known occurrences under similar (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
 
(...) Here's the thing, Terry. You are certainly entitled to your opinion and to express it. I merely questioned the wisdom of your public criticism of something you hadn't fully investigated, or to call something patently stupid without any attempt (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: La belle province
 
(...) Whoops! I meant "nope" as in "nope, you're not misremembering", sorry about that. Texans talk about separatism more often than most, for sure. (...) More like 51st through 64th or whatever, one state for each province/territory I would (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
 
(...) That's not a settled point, so I'd wish you wouldn't assert it as if it were. (...) Nor is that settled. But larger-ly, what's the bearing? Do you disagree that a just government (whether you think a non libertarian government is just or not) (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
 
(...) No, we're to the same standard I would say. (...) There's no better defense than the market of ideas in this sphere but I do not have to prove a point to your satisfaction or else "cede" it. There are other possible outcomes. (...) Well... (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
 
(...) Pardon? If we're held to the same standard, then why do you feel free to dispense little nuggets as if they're revealed truth, but you require me to prove my arguments? (...) Let's hear them. Perhaps, instead of saying "you" in that context, I (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: California the great Democrat experiment
 
(...) Much better to have far-Right conservative clowns at the Federal helm. Bush, as you are for some reason overlooking, has destroyed a far larger budget surplus in far less time than Davis, and Bush has no plans, concrete or abstract, to correct (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
 
(...) "Your attention please: is there a "John Neal" in the NG?" You might have to adjust your thinking. I don't know about you, but I work for a living (self-employed), and so if I don't do anything, I don't make any money. I'd like to hang out (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: WMD, again...
 
(...) lol I just got on-line and see I missed out on all the fun:-) For my part, I thank you for your answers. JOHN (22 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: La belle province
 
Where to begin... (...) K, let's start here--Every elected PM in my lifetime (and most PM's before that) came from *one* province--guess which one. Political oppression? Where? (...) You consider yourselves 'speaking for Quebec' and at the same time (...) (22 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: For Sean...
 
(...) I'll take your word for it. (...) I heard that one on sportscenter. Short clip, but ManUtd won right? (...) Nice. Lemme see, 3 o clock, nope, im at school still, from those freakin extended hours. I'm in middle school and am stuck there from 7 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
 
"Dixie Chicks 'get death threats'" (URL) one's fun too: (URL) recall this happening with The Beatles and the famous thing Lennon said? What I am getting from some of you is that free speech is not without risk. Fine, I don't mind well-reasoned, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
 
I am slightly disappointed that nobody has anything to say about this post. Before Stangl jumps all over me, I am not specifically calling attention to myself as much as the issues I hoped to raise with the original post. Y'all can go right back to (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
 
Well thanks for the definition Richie! I guess I see why some people get angry now... Anyways, thanks for the response, it sums up debate for me! I stick to my points also, so I can see how that is. I know how much people hate being proved wrong, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: For Sean...
 
(...) Again, if I were a hockey fan I might know fer sure who was still innit. I grew up in a sea of hockey fans so all my info is thru them. I think the Sens are still in and I know the Canucks are. So Vancouver or Ottawa--two teams i don't have (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Sports scores redux( Re: For Sean...
 
(...) I just carried on with the thread... :-) (...) Ouch! That hurt! :-P But yes, you have a point. I suppose o-t.d isn't the proper place for them... it's not a topic that "fits in" with the rest. (...) Who told you I don't participate in soccer? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

  Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
 
(...) The reason (if I understand correctly) for having the entire "off-topic" group was for 'safety valve' issues. Otherwise, debates like this that *naturally* creep up inside of on-topic posts would have nowhere to go. You might argue that they (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.280)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR