Subject:
|
Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 17:44:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
260 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
>
> > Equal protection under the law means that the government (which has
> > the force initiation monopoly, remember)
>
> Actually, it must be remembered that the government, then using force in
> accordance with written law, is exercising contract enforcement, which is
> 100% approved by Libertarian philosophy.
That's not a settled point, so I'd wish you wouldn't assert it as if it were.
> Maybe I don't like it, maybe you don't like it, but that's how the
> contract functions. You're under no forced obligation to remain in the
> contract, of course.
Nor is that settled.
But larger-ly, what's the bearing? Do you disagree that a just government
(whether you think a non libertarian government is just or not) ought to
afford all citizens equal protection, or not?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
|
| (...) You're kidding, right? You're saying, in effect, that you are free to assert your opinions as facts, but I'm held to a higher rhetorical standard? (...) Since you're the one on the outside making the claim contrary to the existing system, it (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Patriotism or Mass Hysteria?
|
| (...) Actually, it must be remembered that the government, then using force in accordance with written law, is exercising contract enforcement, which is 100% approved by Libertarian philosophy. Maybe I don't like it, maybe you don't like it, but (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
