Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 4761 – 4780 of about 12000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Yahoo Sucks
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:HGr3ML.1r2s@lugnet.com... (...) are (...) and (...) I absolutely despise yahoo, but for even more reasons. My family has sbc-yahoo dsl. To start, it requires that you have a 300 MHz (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Hmmmmm, is it morbid just to like a big kaboom? I like the kaboom of fireworks. Admittedly, .22 are a simple crack, a 9mil is more of a bang, and you have to get into something bigger than that to even rate a boom much less a kaboom! But yes, (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Possession
(...) No argument there, it was just an example of wealth from someone whose supposed career is making music. Her real career is more truthfully hypnotizing youth culture with her boobs so that they buy into a fake Barbie & Ken music fantasy of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Possession
Tom: I found much of your post deeply interesting and thought provoking. Your idea of the giant archive/database is truly compelling and shows the enormous flaw in the many schemes that publishers are pursuing. Sure, the publishers are pursuing the (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) You're right, I should know to phrase things better. All of the data I have seen everywhere (save the occasional pro-gun loony website that shows a positive benefit to greater availability of guns) shows there is no correlation between the (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Yahoo Sucks
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:HGsF9B.1CsM@lugnet.com... (...) nightmare of (...) you (...) some (...) Icann (...) No they certainly are not clean uninstalls! I never could get rid of the browser bar. Every time I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Yahoo Sucks
(...) I disagree. I do not hate Yahoo. I admire them. Customer support costs money, and it costs a LOT of money to do well. That they can give you any at all for a free to you service, for an advertiser supported service, and still make money is (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Wonderful solution, and I can tell you have no idea what you are talking about. Do you know how hard it is to fight the power? I have done it, and won some and lost most. Not fun, not at all. I'd provide more details but actually it's my own (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) My doubts are on record--the guys policies are morinic at best and he should be booted out of office. Once all the 'facts' are exposed, you will see "Iraqi-gate" for what it is--a fiasco right from the start--botched intelligence, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
This is a kind of digression, I think...this thread seems to be going all over the place. =) (...) Which provides support for the idea of socialized medicine, because if the health services needed to recover from an injury are free they cannot be (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) You are very correct that my anecedotal examples might not always be the best. You are also correct that this bum was not a threat, he actually was pretty nice, giving me directions after I tossed him some coins (although with my ignorance of (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) OK, how about this; Almost all crimes that are prevented by armed people, rather than something else, are not police but rather armed citizens. Is that better? Seriously though we need to keep this whole "high crime rate in the US" thing is (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.286)

		Re: Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate?
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:HGrJ2o.1H9o@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) at (...) things (...) of (...) has (...) ordinary (...) exclusive (...) I read an interesting slashdot article not too long ago about a (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Funny that--and if a group of men were to write up a list of, say, laws that I would like to follow, when would I want those laws to be written? Say, 200+ years ago before there were street lights, law enforcement, cars, and the like, or say, (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: It's not you -- No, it IS you!!!
(...) What? You didn't know this to be true? With all the 'mis'information pervading the media from the supposed 'liberal' outlets, it's amazing the numbers are as small as they are. Discernment is gone by way of the Do-do. Dave K (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Humanity, yes. Most people are good and kind and honest and want only to live their lives unmolested, living by the golden rule or by the wiccan rule or by libertarian principles (even if they can't articulate any of them clearly, that's still (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Gee, condescend much? I have no problem if you want to stick your head out and place it neatly on the chopping block of history, just don't ask me to do the same thing. That's really the crux of the problem: you have your opinion and I have my (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Okay, and I am "delusional" because I trust in the wisdom of Thomas Jefferson and the whole of the Founding Fathers of my country? Who knew?! Do you know what the word "delusional means? It can be defined as: a false belief strongly held in (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) You know, appealing to ideas in a Jeffersonian mold is an appeal to authority, and as perhaps "THEE" central philosophical figure of the foundations of my country, I consider Jefferson an authority whose wisdom is not easily overcome -- and (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) You might want to double check that number, because it would mean that the murder rate increased since the UK imposed tight gun control laws. Not exactly supportive of your argument. Basiclly all of the data I have seen shows there is no (...) (21 years ago, 19-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

More: Next Page >>