Results 1661 – 1680 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) And thank goodness he WASN'T state funded. Free money spoils people. If you don't want to suffer a bit for your art, you're not much of an artist, now are you? Note, that's a utilitarian argument against state funding... the art it produces is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
property
(score: 1.674)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.673)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.672)
|
|
| | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| Dave, (...) Hmm... going in Ann Arbor (MI), Lansing (MI), and Ohio State (Columbus), there were a lot of hoodlums, trying to pick on the college people. The worst was Ohio State, the East side of the campus, right on the border, were some of the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.672)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.672)
|
|
| | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
|
| (...) I may be in breeches, but don't pour any beer, small or otherwise, in them. :-) On a serious note, if the company only wants to mail one per address, then getting one sent to every address you know of *is* following the rules and is not a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.672)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Perhaps they shouldn't have dumped stuff, which they didn't know what its effects might be, in an unsecured area. Think about how we handle radioactive waste. Some of it, we don't really know what effect it will have, so be bundle it up to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.671)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) VAT in practice, though, is more of a sales tax except that companies don't pay it. What happens is that everybody charges VAT on everything, which is to be transferred through to the government, but companies get any VAT they have paid back. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.671)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| <Foyq1t.BEt@lugnet.com> <FoysHv.tu@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Mostly, I just can't FOLLOW it. (...) Yes. Toll walkways may well exist. And, property owners may choose to provide free (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ... (...) funds (...) perhaps (...) border. (...) Well, you are responsible. Now if you can ever prove that your neighbor dragged the body onto your property, you might be able to sue him for damages. He's also (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Maybe in the example of the toppling stiff, the responsibility is an assumed or implied responsibility that comes with owning land or property? As opposed to a direct responsibility such as that of your children etc. (...) Bruce, I know that (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) They were on the toll walkway (no public sidewalks) and fell there as they died. Smugglers aren't involved because they weren't restricted at the border. Actually, they died on your neighbor's property, but he dragged the corpses over to yours (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) Right you are. But why were they starving where they were? Were they starving enroute? And why would they starve once they *got* to libertopia, if they wanted to work? (and, since there's no public assistance, why would they want to come to (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) No, I said it wasn't intended to be taken seriously. I was refering to my example only. But after thinking about it, I decided it may have legitimate repurcussions. My point really is that there can be a cost to a society by having an open (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Please elaborate. We each seem to have a perception that the other is wiggling. Why is that? (...) Not exactly. I'd state it as, responsible for some bad occurance on my property that was an accident, not as, responsible for the immigrant (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| <Fowt5K.s1@lugnet.com> <388E2BFD.FB5B993@voyager.net> <FoynLG.JGJ@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Fair enough, why not me, I'm as good an example as any, and better than most. Posit for (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) You tell me. It could equally be war, persecution, bad weather as crop failure. (...) As long as they were still physically capable of work, what does it matter? (...) You are confusing wanting to and actually getting work swiftly enough or (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Any CEO that keeps that much distance between himself and the company he's running won't be running it for long, and I wonder how he got there in the first place. If bad things happen while he's using his unique "hands off" approach to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.670)
|
|
| | Re: Rush: "Lego is a Tool for 4 year olds"
|
| (...) Agreed. I expect Libertopia to be a GREAT place to start a commune, for example. No pesky laws about how many unmarried people can live in the same place to get in the way (although you may have to find a property not already encumbered with (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.668)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
