To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 2437
2436  |  2438
Subject: 
Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 9 Nov 1999 00:18:31 GMT
Viewed: 
195 times
  
In lugnet.castle, Mike Stanley writes:

Sounds like you're trying to get around to saying that not only do
you acknowledge everyone has a "right" to an opinion, but that
everyone has a "right" to have that opinion respected.

I don't see it that way.  I don't see anything wrong with
disagreeing with the opinions of others, or even calling them into
question.  I don't mind defending my opinions, do you?

There is no inherent conflict with respecting other peoples opinions and
calling them into question. Unless you call them into question without respect.

In the absence of universal truth surely everyones opinions are equally valid,
and deserve respect? Of course, in the absence of universal truth, people have
no "rights" as such.

Erm, I think my argument has just imploded..
Good Night! :)

Richard



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
 
(...) Sometimes it does, yes. Especially from one perspective or another. (...) Sounds like you're trying to get around to saying that not only do you acknowledge everyone has a "right" to an opinion, but that everyone has a "right" to have that (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR