Subject:
|
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:42:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2613 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <388E2BFD.FB5B993@voyager.net>...
> > > But who buries them?
> > > That costs money and presents health problems if not done.
> >
> > Right again.
> >
> > I'd say, where were they when these hypothetical immigrants died? That
> > is, whose property were they on, and why? Rotting bodies are a form of
> > pollution and a public nuisance, which isn't allowed. You don't get to
> > harbor disease vectors, that's negligent.
>
>
> Interesting, I guess either of two cases would apply:
>
> 1. They're trespassers. I guess the property owner is responsible for
> dealing with the bodies (though his community security agreement which funds
> the police may provide for a community response, but that is up to the
> members of the community). Of course if he can find someone who smuggled
> them onto his property, he can sue that individual for the cost (and perhaps
> also charge said individual with trespassing).
They were on the toll walkway (no public sidewalks) and fell there as they
died. Smugglers aren't involved because they weren't restricted at the border.
Actually, they died on your neighbor's property, but he dragged the corpses
over to yours and you can't prove it. :-0
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
