To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3981
3980  |  3982
Subject: 
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 21:50:37 GMT
Viewed: 
2422 times
  
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ...
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:

Larry Pieniazek wrote in message <388E2BFD.FB5B993@voyager.net>...
But who buries them?
That costs money and presents health problems if not done.

Right again.

I'd say, where were they when these hypothetical immigrants died? That
is, whose property were they on, and why? Rotting bodies are a form of
pollution and a public nuisance, which isn't allowed. You don't get to
harbor disease vectors, that's negligent.


Interesting, I guess either of two cases would apply:

1. They're trespassers. I guess the property owner is responsible for
dealing with the bodies (though his community security agreement which • funds
the police may provide for a community response, but that is up to the
members of the community). Of course if he can find someone who smuggled
them onto his property, he can sue that individual for the cost (and • perhaps
also charge said individual with trespassing).

They were on the toll walkway (no public sidewalks) and fell there as they
died.  Smugglers aren't involved because they weren't restricted at the • border.
Actually, they died on your neighbor's property, but he dragged the corpses
over to yours and you can't prove it.  :-0


Well, you are responsible. Now if you can ever prove that your neighbor
dragged the body onto your property, you might be able to sue him for
damages. He's also guilty of a crime (improper disposal of a body sounds
like a crime to me). I'll let Larry deal with any issues related to the
"toll walkway".

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Hey, no way! I left the country! It's on YOUR property. :-) Further, for the example, it is important that it happens on your property. Now if you can ever prove that your neighbor (...) Already addressed: You can't prove it. And it happened (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Yup. There are very good reasons not to let economic refugees cross into your country freely. Most especially if you are richer than your neighbours. (...) The problem isn't that the market wouldn't provide food. It's that the market would not (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR