Subject:
|
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 23:04:29 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@NOSPAMnovera.com
|
Viewed:
|
2456 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
> Yeah, they can starve here just as well as anywhere else.
Right you are.
But why were they starving where they were? Were they starving enroute?
And why would they starve once they *got* to libertopia, if they wanted
to work? (and, since there's no public assistance, why would they want
to come to libertopia if they didn't want to work?)
> But who buries them?
> That costs money and presents health problems if not done.
Right again.
I'd say, where were they when these hypothetical immigrants died? That
is, whose property were they on, and why? Rotting bodies are a form of
pollution and a public nuisance, which isn't allowed. You don't get to
harbor disease vectors, that's negligent.
Your flippant comebacks turn out to be quite amenable to logical
analysis. Thanks for asking.
--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) You tell me. It could equally be war, persecution, bad weather as crop failure. (...) As long as they were still physically capable of work, what does it matter? (...) You are confusing wanting to and actually getting work swiftly enough or (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
