Subject:
|
Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 20:33:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5437 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:
>
> > Yeah, they can starve here just as well as anywhere else.
>
> Right you are.
>
> But why were they starving where they were? Were they starving enroute?
> And why would they starve once they *got* to libertopia, if they wanted
> to work? (and, since there's no public assistance, why would they want
> to come to libertopia if they didn't want to work?)
>
> > But who buries them?
> > That costs money and presents health problems if not done.
>
> Right again.
>
> I'd say, where were they when these hypothetical immigrants died? That
> is, whose property were they on, and why? Rotting bodies are a form of
> pollution and a public nuisance, which isn't allowed. You don't get to
> harbor disease vectors, that's negligent.
>
> Your flippant comebacks turn out to be quite amenable to logical
> analysis. Thanks for asking.
>
> --
> Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
> http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
> fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
>
> Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) Right you are. But why were they starving where they were? Were they starving enroute? And why would they starve once they *got* to libertopia, if they wanted to work? (and, since there's no public assistance, why would they want to come to (...) (27 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
