To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3959
3958  |  3960
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:56:11 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera.IHATESPAMcom
Viewed: 
4733 times
  
<3885F82B.31DF@mindspring.com> <FoLIpw.MEu@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I wasn't a 100% fan of Truman but he did have one thing on his desk that
pretty much summed it up for me...

A sign that said "the buck stops here"

James Brown wrote:
> 
> What puzzles me about this whole argument is how you(in the general sense) can
> be advocating person x being responsible for person y's actions?  If someone
> else causes a violation of rights, how can I being punished for that if I'm
> not directly linked to their actions?  That seems contradictory to the
> underpinnings of libertarian thought.
> 
> Now, if said company officers can be shown beyond reasonable doubt to be
> responsible, then heck yeah, throw the book at them!  But if they're not
> involved, why are they at fault?

They're the CEO. By definition, they're involved. Start enforcing that
thinking and you are going to see big corporations being a lot more
careful.

--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

Note: this is a family forum!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) I understand the sentiment, but I don't understand the position. You(the collective you) appear to say that the officers of a company are liable for the actions of that company REGARDLESS of whether or not they are personally responsible, or (...) (27 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Using a country in the middle of ethnic cleansing as a comparison is hardly flattering. You can get shot in any country, but it's more likely to happen if you live in the US than say the UK. (...) I find it easy to believe, however I would (...) (27 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR