To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3959
3958  |  3960
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 25 Jan 2000 22:56:11 GMT
Reply-To: 
lpieniazek@novera.comAVOIDSPAM
Viewed: 
2371 times
  
<3885F82B.31DF@mindspring.com> <FoLIpw.MEu@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I wasn't a 100% fan of Truman but he did have one thing on his desk that
pretty much summed it up for me...

A sign that said "the buck stops here"

James Brown wrote:

What puzzles me about this whole argument is how you(in the general sense) can
be advocating person x being responsible for person y's actions?  If someone
else causes a violation of rights, how can I being punished for that if I'm
not directly linked to their actions?  That seems contradictory to the
underpinnings of libertarian thought.

Now, if said company officers can be shown beyond reasonable doubt to be
responsible, then heck yeah, throw the book at them!  But if they're not
involved, why are they at fault?

They're the CEO. By definition, they're involved. Start enforcing that
thinking and you are going to see big corporations being a lot more
careful.

--
Larry Pieniazek - larryp@novera.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.

Note: this is a family forum!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) I understand the sentiment, but I don't understand the position. You(the collective you) appear to say that the officers of a company are liable for the actions of that company REGARDLESS of whether or not they are personally responsible, or (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Using a country in the middle of ethnic cleansing as a comparison is hardly flattering. You can get shot in any country, but it's more likely to happen if you live in the US than say the UK. (...) I find it easy to believe, however I would (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR