To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3983
3982  |  3984
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 26 Jan 2000 22:37:30 GMT
Viewed: 
2395 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes:
Maybe I'm reading this completely wrong, but this is how it comes across:
"If we can't actually find out who's fault this is, we'll blame that guy."

Assuming the company is at fault, the CEO is ultimately responsible.

If the CEO is not responsible for EVERYTHING done by the company, what the
heck is he responsible for?

Anything he can be proven to have a hand in.

So all the CEO has to do to avoid responsibility is make sure he doesn't
know enough details to be responsible? Thank you, but I won't be buying
stock in that company. Where is the accountability as to how the company is
run? Responsibility for "accidents" is no different than responsibility for
the financial aspects of the company.

Any CEO that keeps that much distance between himself and the company he's
running won't be running it for long, and I wonder how he got there in the
first place.  If bad things happen while he's using his unique "hands off"
approach to management, it's quite possible that his negligence is a root
cause of whatever happened.

Either you're missing my point, or we are coming from such completely
different directions that we aren't even talking about the same thing.

Let's tackle this from a much more "base level" question.  What is a person
responsible for?

I would answer that they are responsible for themselves, their property, and
any other responsibilities that they freely take on themselves.

James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) I agree. And children and underlings are examples of extra responsibilities freely taken on. Chris (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) the (...) after (...) would (...) I didn't say "is responsible", I said "is probably responsible." In this case, perhaps not, however, anyone having the opportunity to observe that someone is drunk does carry (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR