 | | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes: Proof would be (...) (URL) with these (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
Ed, (...) from "TRAFICANT TOOK DONATION FROM WIFE OF INDICTED MOB FIGURE", or Gorgano Landscaping Company. Whether or not this company is dealing with the mob or not, it is still a legal contribution, unless I am reading something wrong here. As for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) agree, although who can say for sure what the facts are...) "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) to (...) aquittal, (...) Considering that the Civil Court decision was in 1984, and that there is no appeal on file, and the statute of limitations has run out. Owning back taxes and then not paying the back taxes owed is not paying taxes. (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) Yes, your reading is fishy. From the article: "Although Traficant was acquitted in criminal court, he was less successful in civil court. His latest financial disclosure form indicates that he still owes more than $100,000 to the Internal (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
Ed, (...) So, he gets acquitted in a criminal case, and somehow, in civil court, he owes 100,000 to the US tax court for taking bribes? That is what is fishy, Ed. Maybe your reading on it seems a little strange, hence, fishy. Why isn't the IRS after (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) OK. That's the first I heard about the 1984 part, but I wasn't reading that closely, I had a project plan to tweak. But what are we debating here, anyway? The subject doesn't seem to match the words. Traficant is a garden variety pol. Scott (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Wench as a word
|
|
(...) According to the strict definition of the word, Nazi is very appropriate for the Clintons and liberals of their bent. It involves a totalitarian control of industry and the economy, and is similar to Fascism - both of which (Nazi and Fascist) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
Larry, I think it all started when, in the context of defining a wench, I called Hillary a Marxist wench, and Ed, obviously a Hillary fan, got disjointed and started laying out all this other stuff. I just just Traficant as an example of me liking (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) First, I'm not a Hillary fan. But given the choice between Hillary and Rudy, I'm going for Hillary. Because of the two evils, I'll take the one who is playing money games over the one who plays police brutality/murder cover-up games. If you (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
Ed, (...) Boy, was Rudy the one who fired the gun? Because you are linking him directly with police officers, so the police officers are not responsible? I guess you liked New York a lot better when it was a scumpit, filled with crime and sleaze. I (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Which one's which again? I get confused so easily. Police Brutality? Remember Waco. 'nuff said. Murder Coverup? What ever did happen to Vince Foster, anyway? HRC was so busy getting her hands on FBI files that we never did get a good (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) at (...) did (...) defame (...) From the comments above, you clearly could not have bothered reading the news articles involving the incident and Rudy's defamation of the victim. Faulty logic on my part? Your first statement is a prime example (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Larry, Forget the amusing diatribe, I'm much more interested in your opinion of Rudy G. Did you read any of the linked articles? (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
Ed, Well, I did happen to read the articles, BTW. (...) I did read them, thank you, and I still say, if Rudy did something wrong, have it investigated. Which I have said before about Trafficant, etc. (...) Well, your statements like "Rudy's reign of (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Rudy, (...) Nothing amusing about Waco, or bombing a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan on the day of impeachment, or vowing to save the Kosovars or any of the rest of it. And not much amusing about destroying our health care delivery system (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
Larry, (...) Wel, I am honored, but I am hardly a poster child of the Christian RIght. I get into it too much with my pastor's wife for that! :) Scott S. P.S. Rudy did do some wrong things, from what I read (The juvenille record is pretty stupid), (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Larry, The only links you gave in the "Wench" discussion were for the "Nazi" law and the campus orientation. I read the Godwin? Law re: the longer the thread the probablity of Nazi/Hilter =1. The campus orientation article didn't bother me (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) They're in this thread tree somewhere but I'll repeat them. (URL) shows a general view of agenda-ism... (nice coinage James) (URL) shows what poltroons the Clintonistas are. (URL) shows the mastery of the Big Lie. ++Lar (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What is Scott saying now? Was: (Re: Wench as a word)
|
|
(...) Larry, I read them. While interesting reading, they suffer from everything that Scott has accused me of: name calling, lack of evidence, etc. The Mastery of the Big Lie was interesting in that it is an idea developed by Roger Ailes for the (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
