Subject:
|
Re: lowering noise
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2006 10:25:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2032 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Jeff,
--SNIP--
| |
In summary, I guess I’d say that (as I read it) Timothy felt you calling for
banning or some other action being taken to be little more than trying to
start trouble, based on your actions in past posts (somewhat like you accused
him of). I think it was his way of saying you shouldn’t be one to ask for
such, since in his view, you have been at least as bad, if not worse, than
those you’re calling for action against. Rather paralleling the “people in
glass houses shouldn’t throw bricks” saying, I suppose.
|
Thanks. You’ve summed up almost exactly what I meant much better than I did....
with one slight exception: the above statement is not strictly true. While it
was a secondary intent it was certainly not my primary intent to introduce the
pot to the kettle. If I hadn’t had an example from Mark himself I would have
used a different one.
| |
I think it might be time we all just try to forget (or forgive) past
transgressions and start clean from this point forward (which means both the
referenced two year old thread *and* the whole Eric mess). It may be the
only way to begin getting Lugnet back to a more friendly environment.
Jeff
|
Now this sounds like a great idea to me.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
