Subject:
|
Re: lowering noise
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2006 01:23:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9670 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.people, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
| |
| |
If Mark had shown the same respect as you we would not be in this thread
discussing it. In my opinion his post is as much of a form of trolling as
any I’ve seen in the Qwelder thread. But as you point out, my opinion is no
more valid than his.
Tim
|
The way it appears to me Mark has asked a simple question (the one that had
been asked by Frank and gone unanswered) and you have reacted by bringing up
an old and irrelevant thread in which Mark is guilty of nothing more than
lack of tact.
|
The way it appears to me is that Mark is pursuing an agenda (to get other
people banned) and reviving a matter which was finished and I have merely
pointed out a good reason why bans for ‘flaming’ etc. are a risky business.
To add to my argument I brought up the other thread to demonstrate that
Mark’s opinion of what constitutes trolling differs from mine (and almost
certainly other people’s).
|
I won’t speak for Mark, as I know he’s perfectly capable of speaking clearly for
himself. The question originally posed by Frank was echoed by Mark, and I find
myself wondering the same thing. I think you and I are having two separate
conversations - one about Mark and his motives, another about the content of his
(and Frank’s) question. What I’m really interested in here is Mark’s post in
this thread... not to what I would assume are his reasons for posting it.
After all, if I wanted to discuss Mark... well, there’s no shortage of material
for that. ;)
Kelly
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) I don't find myself wondering it because, as I have said, perceptions of trolling etc. are dependent on personal perception whereas Eric's original breach was not. It is the same for where one directs posts (marketplace ads being a specific (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) I find this interesting. I obviously have a different opinion of what constitutes flaming. Calling people "lackeys" seems like flaming to me. As does comparing them to "Baghdad Bob". Could you explain to me why this is not flaming? On a (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
