| |
In lugnet.people, Timothy Gould wrote:
| |
In lugnet.admin.general, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
| |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Suzanne Rich Green wrote:
| |
Questions? bring them to an admin newsgroup.
|
I have a question - and it echos
Frank’s post that went
unanswered/ignored. What was done to the people who baited and flamed? To me
thier actions were far worse than Eric’s. It seems that the trolls, baiters
and flamers got away scott free. And I think that it shows that acting like
that is ok and accepted, and that is a shame.
Mark
Lugnet Member 1634
|
I was looking in this past
thread and couldn’t find the bit where you called for yourself to be banned
in it? Perhaps you could point me to the correct posts.
Although perhaps you don’t consider that flaming? I’ll tell you what though,
I do and if I had to make a list of lugnet trolls you would be on it for that
and other incidents. So how are you planning to choose the list of trolls and
flamers? Mark Papenfuss’ list? Lar’s list? Ross Crawford’s list? Eric’s list?
Gets a bit difficult when personal opinion is involved.
|
You know, I had a big reply I was about to post, but that I thought of what
Suz said:
“Know when to drop it.
Some people have a difficult time quitting arguments. Either they’re afraid of
losing face, they insist on having the last word, or they demand a certain
reaction from others... Whatever the case: please bow out or move the
conversation BEFORE it becomes a big deal. The longer the argument goes on, the
harder it can be to let it go. So do it sooner rather than later! Everyone will
appreciate it, trust me.”
I think you need to take a real hard look at that paragraph. You have repeatedly
posted a post I made two years ago and for what? To try to get a response from
me? To try to discredit me? Whats the point? I stand behind my two-year old post
and I point you to where one of the most
respected members of not only the Lugnet community, but the AFOL community said
it was not flaming, but instead a post with respectful tones.
I have no problem with you having an opinion on my posts, you have every right
to have them – just as I have my opinion on your posts.
I think posts like yours to me and to Eric is a fundamental problem of this
site. You keep turning up the noise on Lugnet where others are trying to lower
it. Would you like an example of you trying to turn the noise up? Ok, I can do
that - You took my post out of the Admin forum where only a small percentage of
people would see it and put it in the general population’s lap - a DIRECT
disregard for what Suz was asking for. And you had no problem when Frank asked
the question, but had a major problem when I echoed his question. If your
motives were true you would have scoffed when Frank posted it, as it was also
after you deemed Eric’s topic “over”. Your efforts are a thinly veiled attempt
to start trouble - I think that is easy to see.
Play well Tim, play well - but please play well while turning your noise down.
Mark
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) It seemed to me he was trying to show a percieved double standard. While I do disagree with the use of the term "flaming" here in this thread (I consider flaming to be a post in order to denigrate another individual openly and and for no (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) Yes I should. I've just woken up (in the morning sense, not the metaphorical sense) enough to realise that my continued posting in this subthread is every bit as bad as your starting of it. Unless I see something I really disagree with I will (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) I have a question - and it echos (URL) post> that went unanswered/ignored. What was done to the people who baited and flamed? To me thier actions were far worse than Eric's. It seems that the trolls, baiters and flamers got away scott free. (...) (19 years ago, 7-Apr-06, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
