Subject:
|
Re: lowering noise
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.people
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2006 10:20:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9714 times
|
| |
|
|
| |
I won’t speak for Mark, as I know he’s perfectly capable of speaking clearly
for himself. The question originally posed by Frank was echoed by Mark, and I
find myself wondering the same thing. I think you and I are having two
separate conversations - one about Mark and his motives, another about the
content of his (and Frank’s) question. What I’m really interested in here is
Mark’s post in this thread... not to what I would assume are his reasons for
posting it.
|
I don’t find myself wondering it because, as I have said, perceptions of
trolling etc. are dependent on personal perception whereas Eric’s original
breach was not. It is the same for where one directs posts (marketplace ads
being a specific case which is distinctly separated in the ToS of Lugnet). My
discussion of his motives only came after Maggie questioned mine. Lets call it
a worked through counterargument with example.
| |
After all, if I wanted to discuss Mark... well, there’s no shortage of
material for that. ;)
Kelly
|
I’m well aware of that which is why I chose an example to fortify my argument
rather than one which did have nothing to do with the situation. By pointing out
that what I consider to be flaming by Mark and what he might consider flaming by
others were different I was making the point that the rule is very difficult to
enforce as it requires so much personal judgement.
Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lowering noise
|
| (...) I won't speak for Mark, as I know he's perfectly capable of speaking clearly for himself. The question originally posed by Frank was echoed by Mark, and I find myself wondering the same thing. I think you and I are having two separate (...) (19 years ago, 8-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
