 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) Every new customer Paul gets, is one that might come back again. I'm sure he'd be happy if he sold a few of these sets to new customers. (...) Lego is for making constructions, not making money. I sell on ebay/trl/lugnet to get money to buy (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | (...) So if Larry were selling coffee beans or stock (as he does - the stock, not the coffee beans (or does he?)) then it would be ok with you if he sells them for "money" or would it only be ok if he sold them in order to be able to buy more of (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm not "presenting" an argument, I'm just answering the question. That is what I do, you, or anyone else, are free to do what ever they want, or at least I hope you are. (...) Did I say that? (...) As you did with this post? (...) What are (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | (...) The same thing Larry did. And of the same thing I'm doing right now - not bothering to actually respond to anything else you say at all, ignoring an opportunity to actually further discussion, but simply coming back with an almost smartass (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) It was hardly worth saying it then? (...) Now I'm not sure if I like _your_ tone. If I ask questions you don't like, just ignore them. Scott A (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Mike Stanley
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Other than to let you know that not just one, but two people perceive your posts that way. I don't know about you, but when 1 person tells me I'm doing something annoying I might just think it's their problem. When two people (or more) tell (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I'm really tempted to tell you what _I_ think. But I do not think that is anyone's interest, including my own I suppose. All I'll say is people in class houses should throw stones. Scott A (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | OK, OK, let's drop this. Scott, you do snipe at people and you're not the only one from the UK (or the US for that matter) that does. It annoys me to no end to carefully craft a response and have most of it ignored so the responder can score some (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | <384689C9.2BC09E99@hw.ac.uk> <38468B94.73FC33EC@voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I won't respond to this. (...) Just take it that I agree or have no opinion on the points I do not respond (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) This is a major misperception from what I have read in numerous e-mail posts from people in Great Britain, do you have examples of "limited access" to health care, etc. or is this just a random statement? You can go to any employer here and (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) In the UK, you do not have to have employed to have access to, arguably, one of the best health services in the world (NHS). Everyone here enjoys a health service which is "free at the point of delivery" - ie it is paid for via income tax. If (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Well, it isn't free, someone is paying for it, whether it be you be the income tax or someone else footing the bill, but this point has been debated ad infinitum in off.topic.debate for a long time (March-September or something?) if you care (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Thanks for the chuckle, Scott. I promise I won't try to perpetuate a common misconception of America. ;-) However...the first job I was ever offered health care in is my current one as a software developer. No other job I've had -- college lab (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | | Jeremy, (...) Misconception? I thought I typed misperception, oh I did. I am glad I can get you to laugh, however! (...) Hmm...I had health insurance from my mom and dad through high school and some college, I didn't have it for three months when I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Jeremy Sproat
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I say conecption, you say perception, let's just order a pizza. (...) Scott, I may be opening a huge can-o-worms here, but... You got off pretty easy in terms of health insurance, esp. being covered by your parents after high school. (My dad's (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Really? Shoot. I'm gonna have to stop reading Lugnet, then - I barely have enough responsiblility to cover my work and real life commitments, none to spare for my hobbies. Or can I be irresponsible by removing the responsibility requirement (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Edward Sanburn
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Umm.... Pizza! :) (...) Not really, most companies do this nowadays. (...) Not really, especially considering if that is one of the things you look for. I can find 20-30 positions in Ann Arbor right now that have health benefits with the job. (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | | (...) In the best time-honoured manner of Usenet debate. Jasper (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Maybe. But his costs to do a one off are pretty steep and he told me (again, I remind you, I've had some rather lengthy conversations about this topic with him, something you don't yet seem to have internalised) he was glad to have sold a (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) That would explain why after that he started up his one per customer rule. A rule which I think he has since set aside... or at least for me :-). What is pertinent about the length of your conversation with paul? I have spoken to Paul 4 or 5 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) No, it wouldn't. (1) I can't offer an explanation for it either. But I can stick to what I told you he told me about it. That's the truth. (...) Well, we weren't talking about the weather, we were talking about substantive issues directly (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I should stay out of pissing matches, but hey, I've got a full bladder so... Another little point in this issue. Is it ok for Paul, or TLC for that matter to make money on LEGO sets? If not, how do you expect to get them? If so, why is it ok (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Frank, if this is aimed at me, I'd just like to say that I have no problem with anyone making money... even those guys making money on the "S@H only" items on ebay does not bother me all that much (I know this goes against the knapp - no (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
